Sunday, February 27, 2005

Charles' woes

Australian women are the most opposed group to Charles eventually becoming King.

He comes woefully short of meeting any fantasy of what it means to be of royal stock. His lifestyle choices could come straight out of a Jerry Springer show - "He wants to be a tampon so he can live in your birth canal". The only thing separating Charles of Buckingham Palace from Chuck of Dryknob Missouri, is access to better dental care.

We want our future royals to be refined. They are supposed to be well mannered and restrained. These two scrubbers come across as tawdry, gaudy white trash.

Now for the alternatives. Harry, sadly is just a silly boy.
William. First born. Parentage assured. Tall. Handsome. Compassionate.
William will be accepted as our dashing, regal King.
He engages with his peers. He is certainly more favoured by the girl-child's generation than his father or grand-mother are.

This is of course if we even want a Royal Family.


Blogger weezil said...

Plumber's gonna have a fit when he shows up at yuour place, Suki.

12:27 pm  
Blogger Ron said...

I guess that's what you call a royal flush!

12:34 pm  
Blogger suki said...

Good one Ron!
Charles is such a non-event, he couldn't possibly be the King or even the Jack in such an auspicious hand.

1:09 pm  
Blogger Jellyfish said...

In The Age, they asked Andrew Denton what he would ask Charles and Camilla if he could interview them, and he responded that if he was being totally frank, he'd say, 'Is the sex worth it?' and 'Camilla, when Charles said he wanted to be your tampon, did you really think that was romantic?'

I laughed.

2:08 pm  
Blogger suki said...

Poor Camilla, he's such a dud.
Nervous tittering, hoping it's black humour, incredulous guffawing...Yes, definitely, laughing and loudly is the only option!

2:36 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home